Permanent Appointment under Rule 17-A-Lahore High Court Decision

Last Updated on June 9, 2017 by Galaxy World

Lahore High Court Bahawalpur Bench has issued decision on 04-05-2017 in connection with Permanent Appointment under Rule 17-A.  Summary of the same is as under:

Learned AAG has presented a copy of notification dated 07.05.2008 to establish that Accounts Branch is empowered to raise objection regarding permanent appointment obtained on the basis of Rule 17-A of the Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment& Conditions of Service) Rules, 1974.of

  1. Since this Court has already interpreted the Rule 17- A of the Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment& Conditions of Service) Rules, 1974. By virtue of judgment reported as  Ali Ahmad V, Executive District Education Officer, Sialkot and another (2014 PLC (C.S) 793 wherein it has been Held that appointment under Rule 17-A of the Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment& Conditions of Service) Rules, 1974. Would be a permanent appointment and there is no concept of appointment of said incumbent on contract basis, therefore, all the replies submitted by the respondents, being contrary to low laid down by this Court, are hereby turned down and the respondents are directed to release the salary of the petitioner forthwith.
  1. With the above observation, this petition stands disposed of.


Permanent Appointment under Rule 17-A


Appointment under Rule 17-A


Share this post

7 thoughts on “Permanent Appointment under Rule 17-A-Lahore High Court Decision

  1. AoA mam.
    mae 17A k tehat metropoliatn corporation mae july 2016 appoint hva tha tb meri matric thee inhoun ny mjhy scale 01 diaa thaaa or ab 2020 mae meri education 2nd devison ha kya mjhy clerk scale mill sakta ha ? agar han to kindly mjhy koi rasta btaien.. i need ur help plzz.
    cell no..
    gmail i’d
    [email protected]

  2. We 269 employee of PARC reinstated in 2011 on the recommendation of cabinet subcommittee approve by PM Gillani 2011.
    case file by Seniors scientists in 2001 against this reinstatement but IHC dismiss case that PM has the terminated and again PM reinstated. again the press out their appeals.
    Now again after 7 years ( SERVING period Nine years) on regular The present Chairman PARC serving notice of Termination on Allegation that
    appointment without advertisement
    appointment violation of PARC commitment before court 19999
    your 2011 impunged appeal was regreted
    Then PM was ousted by Court
    cabenent sub commite unlawful act
    then PARC was ohlding office without approval of Comp[etent authority

    Please help and advise


  3. Sir education government of Punjab under rule 17_A k tehat huwe hain un k regular order ka notification kub karian ge high court ne tu order de dia hia PLZ help me

  4. AA I have served in Livestock And Dairy Development Department since 15 Jan 1994 to 29. 08 .1997. on contract basis in BPS- 17 as Livestock Production Officer. latet on through federal public public service commission I was inducted as Veterinary Officer in RVFC in BPS-17. I have now applied to count my prdvious service for pay,pension and seniority purpose but deptt ssid provide authority for that. I need ur supory to kindly provide me notification of govt of punjab to count contract service into regular service.
    Dr.Muhammad Jawed


Post Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.